Masonic Forum Home Search Members Calendar Who's On Welcome Guest ( Login | Register ) Recent PostsRecent Posts Popular TopicsPopular Topics Home » General » General Masonic Discussion » Democracy within Grand Lodges. 42 posts, Page 4 of 5«««12345»» Democracy within Grand Lodges. Rate Topic Display Mode Topic Options Author Message mopseymopsey Posted 04/07/2009 01:00 Apprentice Group: Forum Members Last Login: Today @ 20:53 Posts: 87, Visits: 325 It's all relative, of course. If you're like me and want nothing more than to be happy with his 'masonic' lot then the demographics and leadership outside of his Lodge are pretty much irrelevant. If, however, you choose another 'masonic' path then the ruling and governing of a Grand Lodge peculiar to yourself should be of the utmost importance. Post #9577 Roy VRoy V Posted 04/07/2009 07:45 Master Group: Forum Members Last Login: Today @ 09:39 Posts: 683, Visits: 1,095 Democracy, shmemocracy. I got the Prime minister I deserved (perhaps - no political point here btw), but despite the British Parliamentary Model, I had no particular say in it, apart from having one vote for or against the majority party, whose members then chose their own leader, who thus became PM, and was replaced years later as PM by a vote within that party - it could have happened the day after the '97 election**.On the other hand, Steve Foley in his local councillor guise, or the Master and Treasurer of my own Lodge, or somewhere in between, a NZ GL, need verification of the "big fish" within that much smaller pond, because they are so much closer to their juniors/'subordinates' (neither being the right word), and thus they are voted for on a personal basis.Consider the Chancellor of the Exchequer - appointed by the PM without my vote, and my Lodge Treasurer, who I do have a say in.Even though I am familiar and matey with some of the Middlesex APGMs, I do not expect to have a big say in the appointment of PMK as my PGM.** I refer, of course, to the Greater London Council election of 1981. Moderate Andrew McIntosh won the election, became Leader, and was replaced by "Red Ken" the next day. Post #9582 M PerrottM Perrott Posted 04/07/2009 14:34 Fellow Group: Forum Members Last Login: Today @ 13:33 Posts: 284, Visits: 2,124 Thanks Roy for answering. I was hoping to avoid discussion of the almost compulsory and compulsive mendacity of politicians, I was really trying to make a very simple point, with a question.Is the "work" performed in the Temple affected by the supposed "democratic" (or not) nature of the systems that individuals Masons are affiliated to? Post #9586 IainIain Posted 04/07/2009 17:35 Master Group: Forum Members Last Login: 26/10/2009 16:13 Posts: 607, Visits: 709 Is the "work" performed in the Temple affected by the supposed "democratic" (or not) nature of the systems that individuals Masons are affiliated to? I dont see a simple yes or no answer to this, the individual lodges and brethren in them should work as they always have done so the system in theory should have no affect to ritual or practices. It can however affect the moral of a lodge and create conflict between brethren which in the run of things has a dramatic effect resulting in non attendance of brethren. Freemasonry as I see it is set up as a democratic system which creates harmony. Anyone tampering or altering that system may not see the immediate problems that are being created by there actions which can be severe. To lose a brother through politics shows a problem in the system, To lose brethren through that system shows that things need looking at from the top down. Cheers, IainDumbarton Kilwinning Lodge No 18 Post #9599 M PerrottM Perrott Posted 04/07/2009 17:43 Fellow Group: Forum Members Last Login: Today @ 13:33 Posts: 284, Visits: 2,124 Wow, thanks Iain, I hadn't looked at it from that angle. Will think a little more and come back to you. Post #9600 mopseymopsey Posted 04/07/2009 22:21 Apprentice Group: Forum Members Last Login: Today @ 20:53 Posts: 87, Visits: 325 M Perrott (04/07/2009) Is the "work" performed in the Temple affected by the supposed "democratic" (or not) nature of the systems that individuals Masons are affiliated to? I hope not as the 'work' is performed for the benefit of the candidate. Post #9605 julesthebitjulesthebit Posted 05/07/2009 10:56 Apprentice Group: Forum Members Last Login: Today @ 15:13 Posts: 87, Visits: 411 mopsey (04/07/2009)M Perrott (04/07/2009)Is the "work" performed in the Temple affected by the supposed "democratic" (or not) nature of the systems that individuals Masons are affiliated to?I hope not as the 'work' is performed for the benefit of the candidate.Hi MopseyYour comment implies that we can't do any Masonic work without a candidate. Whilst that's the view of some Lodges it's not universally true.I'll have to think about Mark's question.S&F, JulesEdited for spelling Post #9615 M PerrottM Perrott Posted 05/07/2009 22:55 Fellow Group: Forum Members Last Login: Today @ 13:33 Posts: 284, Visits: 2,124 Iain (04/07/2009)Is the "work" performed in the Temple affected by the supposed "democratic" (or not) nature of the systems that individuals Masons are affiliated to?I dont see a simple yes or no answer to this, the individual lodges and brethren in them should work as they always have done so the system in theory should have no affect to ritual or practices. It can however affect the moral of a lodge and create conflict between brethren which in the run of things has a dramatic effect resulting in non attendance of brethren.Freemasonry as I see it is set up as a democratic system which creates harmony. Anyone tampering or altering that system may not see the immediate problems that are being created by there actions which can be severe. To lose a brother through politics shows a problem in the system, To lose brethren through that system shows that things need looking at from the top down.Ok, given it far more thought. I can see your point about morale within the Lodge being affected by frictions caused by notions of democracy or lack of it. It may also be "politick" to be diplomatic with regards contact with other members of the same Lodge GL etc but I was thinking more about the "vibe" within the Temple. It has been suggested by others that there is a resonance or even an unheard melody played by the supposed incantations or order of words within the ritual. Whether that is true, or it is fanciful pretention I have no idea. But there is no denying there is a rhythm to the text that is most obvious when the Lodge has opened in perfect calm and when the most effort has been put into correct memorisation and delivery of the ritual. (The mood falls flat on it's face when someone is so obviously reading it, like for instance a stand in Inner Guard)Within that context, is the mood of perfect calm interrupted or even halted by the concept of say, for instance, the UGLE not electing its Grand Master? Do the "players" in the allegory of temple building feel less equal to the task in hand or to each other just because they didn't get to vote in some election external to their endeavors?I would suggest that such unbecoming thoughts should have been laid to rest by the address to the Brethren straight after a new Masters Installation. Some are there to teach but all are there to learn.Discussion of "Democracy" therefore has no place within a Tyled Lodge I humbly submit. Especially as all those present bow to their chosen Supreme being and cheerfully submit to his will as revealed. Or so the story goes.. Post #9641 M PerrottM Perrott Posted 05/07/2009 23:25 Fellow Group: Forum Members Last Login: Today @ 13:33 Posts: 284, Visits: 2,124 mopsey (04/07/2009)It's all relative, of course.If you're like me and want nothing more than to be happy with his 'masonic' lot then the demographics and leadership outside of his Lodge are pretty much irrelevant.If, however, you choose another 'masonic' path then the ruling and governing of a Grand Lodge peculiar to yourself should be of the utmost importance.Sorry Mopsey, missed this one first time around. Not ignoring you, honest. Are you suggesting that some on the outside see it as "socially responsible" to interfere within the affairs of the UGLE, an organisation they are not/ have not been members of? Do you think they think they are "saving" those in the UGLE that are, as they see it, slaving under an oppressive regime that keeps them obedient with fear and threat of sanction?An interesting concept. Perhaps those that are supposedly trapped can see for themselves they are not, and wilfully continue by free choice and use of their own intelligence to enjoy their membership. I would suggest they certainly don't need or want saving. Post #9643 M PerrottM Perrott Posted 05/07/2009 23:30 Fellow Group: Forum Members Last Login: Today @ 13:33 Posts: 284, Visits: 2,124 julesthebit (05/07/2009)mopsey (04/07/2009)M Perrott (04/07/2009)Is the "work" performed in the Temple affected by the supposed "democratic" (or not) nature of the systems that individuals Masons are affiliated to?I hope not as the 'work' is performed for the benefit of the candidate.Hi MopseyYour comment implies that we can't do any Masonic work without a candidate. Whilst that's the view of some Lodges it's not universally true.I'll have to think about Mark's question.S&F, JulesEdited for spellingHey there Jules.UGLE Lodges doing Masonic work without candidates? Oh my word, don't let that secret out, you would be killing off years of urban myths and anti UGLE propaganda by saying things like that. (Fancy some contraband? I have a copy of the Ist and 2nd degree lectures here. Don't tell anyone, but I have seen both presented at Tyled Lodge meetings) Post #9644 « Prev Topic | Next Topic » 42 posts, Page 4 of 5«««12345»» Reading This Topic Active Users: 0 (0 guests, 0 members, 0 anonymous members) No members currently viewing this topic. Forum Moderators: TFM Admin, Mike Martin, Stu Thorpe, Tom Cherup Forum Jump... ---------------- Forum Home Search Members List Calendar Who's Online ---------------- Site Announcements |-- Announcements General |-- Fraternal Greetings to our New Forumites |-- General Masonic Discussion |-- Masonic History (Legend -V- Fact) |-- Ritual - Esoteric & Symbols |-- Travellers' Diary & Dates |-- The Reading/Watching Room |-- The Appendant Degrees and Orders |-- Feminine & Co-Masonry |-- Knobs & Excrescences All times are GMT, Time now is 10:56pm Powered By InstantForum.NET v4.1.4 © 2010 Execution: 0.047. 7 queries. Compression Disabled.
On the other hand, Steve Foley in his local councillor guise, or the Master and Treasurer of my own Lodge, or somewhere in between, a NZ GL, need verification of the "big fish" within that much smaller pond, because they are so much closer to their juniors/'subordinates' (neither being the right word), and thus they are voted for on a personal basis.
Consider the Chancellor of the Exchequer - appointed by the PM without my vote, and my Lodge Treasurer, who I do have a say in.
Even though I am familiar and matey with some of the Middlesex APGMs, I do not expect to have a big say in the appointment of PMK as my PGM.
** I refer, of course, to the Greater London Council election of 1981. Moderate Andrew McIntosh won the election, became Leader, and was replaced by "Red Ken" the next day.
Is the "work" performed in the Temple affected by the supposed "democratic" (or not) nature of the systems that individuals Masons are affiliated to?
Dumbarton Kilwinning Lodge No 18
Hi Mopsey
Your comment implies that we can't do any Masonic work without a candidate. Whilst that's the view of some Lodges it's not universally true.
I'll have to think about Mark's question.
S&F, Jules
Edited for spelling
Ok, given it far more thought.
I can see your point about morale within the Lodge being affected by frictions caused by notions of democracy or lack of it. It may also be "politick" to be diplomatic with regards contact with other members of the same Lodge GL etc but I was thinking more about the "vibe" within the Temple.
It has been suggested by others that there is a resonance or even an unheard melody played by the supposed incantations or order of words within the ritual. Whether that is true, or it is fanciful pretention I have no idea. But there is no denying there is a rhythm to the text that is most obvious when the Lodge has opened in perfect calm and when the most effort has been put into correct memorisation and delivery of the ritual. (The mood falls flat on it's face when someone is so obviously reading it, like for instance a stand in Inner Guard)
Within that context, is the mood of perfect calm interrupted or even halted by the concept of say, for instance, the UGLE not electing its Grand Master? Do the "players" in the allegory of temple building feel less equal to the task in hand or to each other just because they didn't get to vote in some election external to their endeavors?
I would suggest that such unbecoming thoughts should have been laid to rest by the address to the Brethren straight after a new Masters Installation.
Some are there to teach but all are there to learn.
Discussion of "Democracy" therefore has no place within a Tyled Lodge I humbly submit. Especially as all those present bow to their chosen Supreme being and cheerfully submit to his will as revealed. Or so the story goes..
Sorry Mopsey, missed this one first time around. Not ignoring you, honest.
Are you suggesting that some on the outside see it as "socially responsible" to interfere within the affairs of the UGLE, an organisation they are not/ have not been members of? Do you think they think they are "saving" those in the UGLE that are, as they see it, slaving under an oppressive regime that keeps them obedient with fear and threat of sanction?
An interesting concept. Perhaps those that are supposedly trapped can see for themselves they are not, and wilfully continue by free choice and use of their own intelligence to enjoy their membership.
I would suggest they certainly don't need or want saving.
Hey there Jules.
UGLE Lodges doing Masonic work without candidates? Oh my word, don't let that secret out, you would be killing off years of urban myths and anti UGLE propaganda by saying things like that.
(Fancy some contraband? I have a copy of the Ist and 2nd degree lectures here. Don't tell anyone, but I have seen both presented at Tyled Lodge meetings)
For Email Marketing you can trust